HINDUISM
Hinduism
is a blanket term for the indigenous religious tradition of
the Indian
subcontinent. To be considered "within the fold,"
one must nominally
acknowledge the authority of the four Vedas. These ancient
religious texts
express concepts and values bearing little resemblance to
current Hinduism,
much as the first five books of the Old Testament express a
religious ideology
at variance, on many points, from that of current
Christianity. Indian
religions that reject the authority of the Vedas--
particularly Jainism,
Buddhism, and Sikhism-- are regarded as non-Hindu. However,
what is left over
even after these other religions are subtracted is a broad
diversity of beliefs
and practices that, at their extremes, bear little
resemblance to one other. A
villager sacrificing a goat during a Kali festival in
Bengal is as much a Hindu
as the office worker engaged in quiet meditation in his
suburban Bombay home.
Hinduism's
sometimes mind-boggling diversity is at least partially a
result of India's complex
history. Over the millennia, the Indian subcontinent has
been subjected to
innumerable influxes of different peoples. Rather than
serving as a
"melting pot" in which various ethnicities were
completely submerged
into the preexisting culture, India has tended to allow
each new group of
migrants to maintain at least some of their
distinctiveness. A new social
grouping (subcaste) was created for each group, a social
institution that
simultaneously incorporates and draws a boundary around
intruders. Thus new ideas,
practices, and gods could be at least partially retained
within the invaders'
communities, thereby contributing to Hinduism's complexity.
Another
trait of the Hindu tradition is that earlier strands of
spiritual tend to be
retained rather than discarded as new religious forms
emerge. Thus in the wake
of a devotional reform movement, for example, certain
segments of the
population might be persuaded to abandon older practices
and ideas in favor of
something new, but other members of the community will
continue in the old
ways. As a result of this characteristic, ideas and
practices that are very ancient--sometimes
thousands of years old--are still practiced by at least
some contemporary
Hindus
.While
there are many other ways of organizing Hindu religious
history, for the
purpose of discussing beliefs and practices we will
distinguish only the three
"layers" of the Hindu tradition outlined above,
namely: Vedic ritualism,
Upanishadic mysticism, and devotional salvation. Around 800
B.C.E. and afterward,
Vedic Hinduism, with its heavy dependence on
ritualistically knowledgeable
priests, was challenged by a more individualistic form of
spiritual expression
that rejected many of the basic views and values of Vedism.
This emergent view
was expressed in a set of religious texts collectively
referred to as the
Upanishads. The differences between Vedic and Upanishadic
Hinduism are quite
marked. For example, in contrast to the risky, tenuous
afterlife body that it
was the function of certain Vedic rituals to create and
maintain, the
Upanishads postulated an eternal, changeless core of the
self that was referred
to as the Atman.
Atman appears to
have originally referred to the breath. (As the invisible
part of the person
that stopped once life had departed, the breath was often
associated with--and
sometimes even identified with--the soul in many different
world cultures.)
This soul or deep self was viewed as being identical with
the unchanging
godhead, referred to as Brahman (the
unitary ground of being that transcends particular gods and
goddesses). The equation
of the deep self with the ultimate is expressed in
innumerable ways, such as in
the Upanishadic formula Tat tVam asi
("Thou
art that!"), meaning that the essential
"you" is the same as
that indescribable ("Wherefrom words turn back")
essence of
everything:
He
who, dwelling in all things, yet is other than
all
things,
whom all things do not know, whose
body
all
things are, who control is all things from
within.
He
is your soul, the Controller, the
Immortal.
Untouched
by the variations of time and circumstance, the Atman was
nevertheless entrapped
in the world of
samsara. Samsara is
the South Asian term for the world we experience in our
everyday lives. This
constantly changing, unstable world is contrasted with the
spiritual realm of
Atman/Brahman, which by contrast is stable and unchanging.
Samsara also refers to
the process of death
and rebirth (reincarnation) through which we are
"trapped" in this
world. Unlike many Western treatments of reincarnation,
which make the idea of
coming back into body after body seem exotic, desirable,
and even romantic,
Hinduism, Buddhism, and other South Asian religions portray
the samsaric
process as unhappy: Life in this world is suffering.
What
keeps us trapped in the samsaric cycle is the law of karma.
In its simplest
form, this law operates impersonally like a natural law,
ensuring that every
good or bad deed eventually returns to the individual in
the form of reward or
punishment commensurate with the original deed. It is the
necessity of "reaping
one's karma" that compels human beings to take rebirth
(to reincarnate) in
successive lifetimes. In other words, if one dies before
reaping the effects of
one's actions (as most people do), the karmic process
demands that one come
back in a future life. Coming back into another lifetime
also allows karmic
forces to reward or punish one through the circumstance in
which one is born.
Hence, for example, an individual was generous in one
lifetime might be reborn
as a wealthy person in her or his next incarnation. Moksha
is the traditional
Sanskrit term for release or liberation from the endless
chain of deaths and
rebirths. In the south Asian religious tradition, it
represents the supreme
goal of human strivings. Reflecting the diversity of
Hinduism, liberation can
be attained in a variety of different ways, from the proper
performance of
certain rituals to highly disciplined forms of yoga. In the
Upanishads, it is
proper knowledge, in the sense of insight into the nature
of reality, that
enables the aspiring seeker to achieve liberation from the
wheel of rebirth.
What
happens to the individual after reaching moksha? In
Upanishadic Hinduism, the
individual Atman is conceived of as merging into the cosmic
Brahman. A
traditional image is that of a drop of water which, when
dropped into the ocean,
loses its individuality and becomes one with the ocean.
While this metaphor is
widespread, it does not quite capture the significance of
this
"merger." Rather than losing one's individuality,
the Upanishadic
understanding is that the Atman is never separate from
Brahman; hence individuality
is illusory, and moksha is simply waking up from the dream
of separateness. The
most that the classical texts of Hinduism say about the
state of one who has merged
with the godhead is that she or he has become one with pure
"beingness," consciousness, and
bliss..
http://www.hinduweb.org
http://www.hindu.org
ttp://www.hinduism.co.za/
http://www.hinduismtoday.kauai.hi.us
References Basham,
Arthur L. The Origins and
Developments of Classical
Hinduism. Boston: Bea con Press, 1989.
Rood, Gavin. An Introduction to Hinduism. London: Cambridge
University Press,
1996.
Hopkins, Thomas.
"Hindu Views of Death
and Afterlife.. in Death and Afterlife:
Perspectives opf Worl Religions. Edited by Hiroshi
Obayashi. Wesport,
Conn,: Greenwood Press, 1992, pp. 149-64
Kinsley, avid R. Hinduism, a
Cultural
Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall,
Inc., 1993
Klostermaier,Klaus K.
A Survey ofHinduism Albany: State University of
New York Press,
1989
|