Concentration Camps by Any Other
Name
“In May
2001, the government (of China) took a group of western reporters on a tightly
controlled tour of Masanjia labor camp in northeastern Liaoning Province, which
Falun Gong had also accused of torturing followers. The reporters saw nothing untoward.” (“Word of Falun Gong Deaths Sets Off
Dispute on Cause” – NYT 4 July)
The
western reporters saw nothing wrong with people held in forced labor camps,
though charged with no crime, having had no trial, no due process, no course of
appeal, no way out except by denouncing a spiritual practice which has been
outlawed despite no individual being tried in any court?
Did the reporters
confirmed that those in the “labor camps” go home to their families and children
at night, receive a living wage, have a union, legal representation, can demand
change in conditions when a co-worker gives birth in a field and continues
working an hour later?
The reporters noted no similarity to the
Nazi’s escorting Red Cross representatives on tightly controlled tours of
concentration camps where they also saw nothing untoward?
These reporters
were handpicked for their previous critical coverage of China’s human rights
record, understanding of basic international treaties, and in depth stories
exposing human rights abuses in other nations?
Removing the word “forced” from “labor camp”
means it is no longer a concentration camp where basic human rights are
violated, the most basic freedom of belief has no meaning and armed guards,
rape, and beating are not an atrocity – as long as the inmates don’t actually
die? And if they do die, the
question is whether they took their own lives in desperation or were battered
to death?
Publishing this story on the 4th
of July was not a sick irony?
Nancy O’Meara
Foundation for Religious Freedom
Co-author “The Cult Around the
Corner”
|