World
Religion News
Service
www.wrns.org
Email:
wrns@wrns.org
"Court Rules on Door
Solicitations"
(AP, June 17, 2002)
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Constitution
protects the right of missionaries, politicians and others to knock on doors
without first getting permission from local authorities, the Supreme Court ruled
Monday.
The court struck down a local law that
leaders of a small Ohio town said was meant to protect elderly residents from
being bothered at home. The ruling is a victory for the Jehovah's Witnesses,
whose religion calls for doorstep proselytizing.
By a vote of 8 to 1, the court reasoned
that the First Amendment right to free speech includes the entitlement to take a
message or idea directly to someone's door, and that the right cannot be limited
by a requirement to register by name ahead of time.
"The mere fact that the ordinance covers
so much speech raises constitutional concerns," Justice John Paul
Stevens wrote for himself and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony M.
Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen
Breyer.
"It is offensive, not only to the values
protected by the First Amendment, but to the very notion of a free society, that
in the context of everyday public discourse a citizen must first inform the
government of her desire to speak to her neighbors and then obtain a permit to
do so."
Two of the court's most conservative
justices, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, agreed only with the outcome of
the case and did not sign on to Stevens' reasoning.
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist
dissented.
Stratton, Ohio, required a permit for any
door-to-door soliciting by salesmen or anyone else. Theoretically, girl scouts
would have to get such a permit to sell cookies, as would a candidate for the
school board or a student raising money for a class trip.
The majority in Monday's case said the law
was too broad. Had it been much more narrowly written to guard against unwanted
sales calls, it might have withstood constitutional scrutiny, Stevens
wrote.
People who do not want to listen to a
political candidate or other canvasser need not do so, the court said. Residents
may post a "No Solicitations" sign at the door, or simply refuse to engage in
conversation.
The court also rejected the town's claim
that the law helped prevent crime. There is no evidence that a criminal casing a
neighborhood would be deterred by the need to get a permit, the court said.